Skip to content
SF-2026-000415UnverifiedAliens & UAPs

NASA-UAP-D007: Skylab Technical Crew Debriefings, 1973–1974

This document, released by the U.S. Department of War as item NASA-UAP-D007, compiles excerpts from the technical crew debriefings of the three crewed Skylab missions of 1973–1974. Skylab, the first U.S. laboratory in space, launched May 14, 1973. In the Skylab 1/2 debriefing (June 30, 1973), Science Pilot Joseph Kerwin and crewmates Charles Conrad and Paul Weitz describe seeing recurring light flashes—spots, sunbursts, and streaks—most often while resting with eyes closed, occurring two or three per minute and discussed in relation to the South Atlantic anomaly and possible cosmic particles. In the Skylab 1/3 debriefing (October 4, 1973), Owen Garriott, Jack Lousma, and Alan Bean describe tracking a bright reddish object about a week before splashdown: a slowly rotating object with a roughly 10-second brightness period in a very similar orbit to their own, which they estimated was 30 to 50 nautical miles away and whose identification was never explained to them. In the Skylab 1/4 debriefing (February 22, 1974), Commander Gerald Carr reports two or three sightings of flashing lights outside with definite relative motion, which the crew presumed were other pieces of Skylab or satellites. The document carries standard NASA FOIA-exemption notices. The astronauts generally interpreted their observations in natural or mundane terms (cosmic-ray flashes, satellites, spacecraft debris).

Source: U.S. Department of Warwar.govIncident 1973Released May 8, 2026Discovered Jul 2, 2026294.6 KBdocument
sha256:61f7e6594e7ab6959503

Description

Excerpts from the technical crew debriefings of all three crewed Skylab missions (Skylab 2, 3, and 4) conducted at NASA's Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center in 1973–1974, compiled and released as part of a U.S. government UAP-related document release. The passages document astronaut observations of unusual visual phenomena including light flashes, a reddish rotating satellite-like object, and flashing lights outside the station.

Claims

  • Skylab 2 crew members saw recurring light flashes (two or three per minute), most often with eyes closed, possibly associated with the South Atlantic anomaly or cosmic particles.

    90%
  • The Skylab 3 crew tracked a bright reddish, slowly rotating object with a ~10-second brightness period in a nearly identical orbit, estimated 30–50 nautical miles away, whose identity was never explained to them.

    90%
  • The Skylab 4 crew observed two or three instances of flashing lights outside the station with definite relative motion, presumed to be other Skylab debris or satellites.

    90%
  • Skylab 2 crew members saw recurring light flashes (two or three per minute) that waxed and waned, possibly associated with the South Atlantic anomaly and cosmic particles, which they stated were not hallucinations.

    90%
  • The observed light flashes were not considered hallucinations by the crew.

    85%
  • Skylab 3 crew tracked a bright reddish, slowly rotating object (10-second brightness period) for about 5–10 minutes in an orbit very similar to their own, estimated 30–50 nautical miles away, whose identity was never explained to them.

    85%
  • Skylab 4 crew observed two or three instances of flashing lights with definite relative motion outside the station, presumed to be Skylab debris or other satellites, some appearing to tumble.

    85%
  • The observed objects and light phenomena remained unidentified to the crews at the time of debriefing.

    70%

Events

  1. May 13, 1973

    Skylab launch

    Launch of Skylab, the United States' first laboratory in space.

  2. Jun 29, 1973

    Skylab 1/2 Technical Crew Debriefing

    Debriefing in which crew described recurring light flashes seen aboard the station.

  3. Oct 3, 1973

    Skylab 1/3 Technical Crew Debriefing

    Second crew debriefing documenting a bright reddish rotating object tracked in a similar orbit about a week before splashdown.

  4. Feb 21, 1974

    Skylab 1/4 Technical Crew Debriefing

    Third crew debriefing documenting flashing lights with relative motion seen outside the station.

  5. May 7, 2026

    Document release

    Release of the compiled debriefing excerpts as UAP document NASA-UAP-D007.

  6. May 7, 2026

    Public release of Skylab UAP debriefing

    Release of the compiled debriefing excerpts via the U.S. Department of War UAP disclosure.

Dates mentioned

1973-05-141973-06-301973-10-041974-02-222026-05-08

Keywords

Entities

Extracted text (OCR)
JSC-08053

SKYLAB 1/2
TECHNICAL
CREW DEBRIEFING
JUNE 30, 1973

PREPARED BY
TRAINING OFFICE
CREW TRAINING AND SIMULATION DIVISION

NOTICE: This document may be exempt from public disclosure under
the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S. C. 552). Requests for its
release to persons outside the U. S. Government should be handled
under the provisions of NASA Policy Directive 1382 .2.

Natwnal Aeronautics and Space Administration

LYNDON B. JOHNSON SPACE CENTER
Houston, Texas

KERWIN

Unusual or Unexpected Visual Phenomenon.

We saw light flashes.

(CONT'D)

I think all of us saw them.

I saw them most often when I was

in the sack at night with my eyes closed but awake naturally.
They tended to wax and wane in frequency.

Someone asked me if

that was in conjunction with the South Atlantic anomaly.

It

may have been.

I didn't have the pad with me at that time and

I don't know.

They were numerous at times - two or three per

minute.
CONRAD

Some of them to me were a spot or sunbursts.

Some were streaks.

The streaks, in my case, were less frequent than the bursts.
Most of them were in my peripheral visual field.
the central visual fieJ.d.

Very few in

I don't know why.

Q,UERY

You could isolate them to one eye, couldn't you?

KERWIN

No, I couldn't.

WEITZ

I would say mine were primarily in the left eye for some
reason.

:::oNRAD

You have to concentrate but you can determine they are in one
eye.

:IBRWIN

I did not.

That was foolish of me but I didn't try.

they are in one eye.

23-20

I'm sure

CONRAD

Sometimes I'd be lying there with my eyes half closed, and I'd
see a fire sensor wink.

KERWIN

And you'd have to be careful that you weren't confusing that
with the fire flash.

Once you've seen a few of each, there is

question of which is which.

KERWIN

They're not an hallucination.

We didn't feel it was operationally necessary for anybody to
know about it right now.

WEITZ

I had a couple that I thought were cosmic particles.

I saw

an entrance streak and an exit streak.
CONRAD

Yes, I did too.

WEITZ

Where, bing-bing, it seemed like it was one side of the eyeball,
and then the other side.

CONRAD

One night I remember that there was a long shot then it was
blank then there was a long shot in rapid succession, of
course, but very definitely in and out - or across the eye.

KERWIN

Medical Kits and IMSS.

As far as adequate quantity of medica­

tion and supplies, I would guess we used about 0.01 percent
of the available medication.

I think this is something for

me to sit down with the doctors and talk about.

There is

plenty of medicine up there for the Skylab missons.

23-21

There is

JSC-08478

SKYLAB 1/3
TECHNICAL
CREW DEBRIEFING
PREPARED BY
TRAINING OFFICE
CREW TRAINING AND SIMULATION DIVISION

NOTICE: This document may be exempt from public disclosure
under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U. S .C. 552). Requests
for its release to persons outside the U.S. Government shou Id be
handled under the provisions of NASA Policy Directive 1382 .2.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

LYNDON B. JOHNSON SPACE CENTER
Houston, Texa,s

OCTOBER 4, 1973

BEAN

I did too.

LOUSMA

Things we saw out the window.

GARRIOTT

For example, we saw that satellite about a week before splashdown.

The sack would move over in the corner.

That was one of the most unusual things that we saw

and I guess Jack noticed it looking out the window.

This

bright reddish object was out there and we tracked it for
about 5 or 10 minutes.

It was obviously a satellite in a very

similar orbit to our own.

It was rotating and had a period

of almost exactly 10 seconds because you could see the brightness vary with that period.

We followed it until sunset and

it went out of sunlight just about 5 to 7 seconds after we
did.

It held its position nearly the same, in the wardroom

window for that 10-minute interval although we could see it
drift in relative positions slightly, maybe 10 to - 20 degrees
during the course of that 10-minute interval.

It was reddish

in color even when we were well above the horizon.

As we

approached sunset, it turned more reddish, presumably because
. of the sunlight change.

What satellite it was and how it

happened to end up in such a similar orbit, no one ever explained
to us.

And I would like to hear a few words from someone about

that satellite.

7-4

BEAN

You bet.

We never saw it again.

You'd think we would have

seen it the next night or it would cycle by another time.
Maybe it did and we weren't looking out the window.

LOUSMA

You might point out that it never did take the shape of an
object but it was always brighter than any other star or
planet in the night sky.

BEAN

It was much brighter.

We tried monitors and everything on it but we could never
make it into anything other than a bright light.

LOUSMA

In doing T002, I had on other occasions, at least once or
twice, seen other satellites although they appeared as star
points of light.

BEAN

Let's talk about caution/warnings at night and in the daytime.
I noticed at first when we did have caution/warnings in the
daytime we all whistled up there real quick to see what was
happening.

Then as the mission wore on, we tended to just let

whoever was closest take a look.

Without the TACS on, there

isn't a lot that can go on exc~pt rapid DELTA-P which sounds
different than any of the other caution/warnings, particularly
just a caution.

I recommend to Jerry and his crew, and I'm

sure that this recommendation will be hard to live by, that
caution/warnings don't appear to be anything you have to hurry
and resolve or stop doing your tasks to race up to the panel

7-5

20.0
LOUSMA

VISUAL SIGHTINGS

Let's talk about visual sightings.

Any comments on countdown.

You saw your way to the booster or you didn't see that.
Visual sighting no problem there.

BEAN

You might want to talk about the visual sightings on that
orbit when Owen and Jack saw the satellite.

LOUSMA

Yes, let's go through countdown.

Any visual sightings on

countdown that were significant?

We saw the swing arm go

away and all that kind of thing.
Powered Flight:

I watched the booster protector cover go

off and lots of flashes and debris and everything in every
separation, but that's all norminal.

During orbit: -

GARRIOTT

Do you want to talk about that satellite?

LOUSMA

I saw a couple of satellites that appeared like a satellite
would on the Earth.

I saw one that was not like one you

would see on Earth, so why don't you mention it.

GARRIOTT

Okay, about a week or 10 days before recovery and we were
still waiting for information to be supplied to us about the
indentification.

Jack first noticed this rather large red star

out the wardroom window.

Upon close examination, it was much

brighter than Jupiter or any of the other planets.

20-1

It had

GARRIOTT
(CONT'D)

a reddish hue to it, even though it was well above the
horizon.

The light from the Sun was not passing close to

the Earth's limb at the time.

We observed it for about

10 minutes prior to sunset.

It was slowly rotating because

it had a variation in brightness with a 10-second period.
As I was saying, we observed it for about 10 minutes, until
we went into darkness, and it also followed us into darkness
about 5-seconds later.

From the 5- to 10-second delay in

it's disappearance we surmised that it was not more than 30
to 50 nautical miles from our location.

From it's original

position in the wardroom window, it did not move more than
10 or 20 degrees over the 10 minutes or so that we watched it.
It's orbit was very close to that of our own.

We never saw

it on any - earlier or succeeding orbits and we'd be quite
interested in having its identification established.

It's

all debriefed in terms of time on channel A, so the percise
timing and location can be picked up from there.
LOUSMA

Okay, other visual sightings was the one out the wardroom
window.

That sunrise or sunset which finally led us to the

RCS leak in the command module.

It disappeared like

thousands and thousands of stars out there; all of them
different sizes and drifting along the X-axis.
we already mentioned.

The one that

The one right after insertion where

we saw the leak in the same manner of the RCS streaming towards
20-2

JSC-08809

SKYLAB 1/4
TECHNICAL
CREW DEBRIEFING
FEBRUARY 22, 1974
PART

I

PREPARED BY
TRAINING OFFICE
CREW TRAINING AND PROCEDURES DIVISION

I

NOTICE: This document may be exempt from public
disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act
(5 U.S. C. 552). Requests for its release to persons
outside the U. S. Government should be handled under
the provisions of NASA Policy Directive 1382 .2.

National Aeronautics and Space Adminutration

LYNDON B. JOHNSON SPACE CENTER
Houston, Texa,s

GI:E,SON
are still on the windows. Just what that material is, I'm not
( C(,NT 'D)
sure. But the remaining pieces should be useful for contamination studies.
CA:E:R

One other item is the ammonia odor in the head which we discovered about the last week in the mission.
was causing it.

We weren't sure what

Bill had changed out the charcoal canister.

We disconnected the boot between the charcoal canister and the
blower above it and took a sniff of that.
there.

We smelled, no ammonia

When we connected the boot back up to the blower, a

very strong ammonia odor came from the blower output.

Thus it

appears that the source of the smell was the blower unit itself
and not the charcoal canister.

As we said in our report of it

to the ground, we decided that it was tolerable for the rest of
the mission.

Therefore, we didn't get into the mode of finding

another blower to put in there.

I feel that the odor very

definitely increased in intensity during the final week of the
mission.
CA1R

One other area of unusual events that we reported on the dump
tapes was that on occasion we saw some lights flashing outside
with very a definite motion relative to ours.

We presumed that

they were other pieces of Skylab, or possibly other satellites.
We reported our two or three sightings of that kind as soon as
they occurred.

We have no special comments concerning them,

7-8

CARR

but we did find it very interesting to be able to see other

(CONT'D)

objects up there with us.

The fact that one or two of them

appeared to be tumbling was apparently due to the oscillation
of the light flashes that we were getting from them.

POGUE

The OWS Heat Exchangers:

There's a major design flaw there in

that filters were not installed upstream of the OWS heat exchanger
vanes.

When we first arrived, the vanes were so uniformly coated

with lint that I thought there was some kind of anodized surface
on them.

I was never fully convinced that I had done the

vacumming job properly; therefore, I fabricated a special tool
that fit flush against those surface vanes so that I could
exert a good vacuum.

Though they are not supposed to be con­

densive heat exchangers, I sucked quite a bit of condensate water
out of them.

I tried the best I could to keep those things

clean, yet I never did get all that lint pulled out of there.
That is why I think we needed a filter in the system.
GIBSON

EVA anomalies might also be mentioned here.

For example, you

had the water leak outside, and I also got a water leak.

POGUE

One thing that was not mentioned on air-to-ground as a possible
cause of the problem was the single-point failure that exists
in the mechanical way that the PCU composite connector is
hooked to the PCU.

I was able during EVA, maneuvering through

the clothesline ropes, not only to open the lock but also to
extend the arm which pulls the PCU composite connector off.

7-9



Related files

Connected through the network